Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,919 of 84,120 nationally
Little India Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031020301 · Cook County, IL · pop 5,432 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 17031020301 covers part of the Little India area of Chicago, IL, and scores 7/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,093
Renter share25.0%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate13.2%
Median income$76,327
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
44
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
82
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 42.0069, -87.7052 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little India scores 7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
13.2% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,341 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Little India compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 67%Socioeconomic
- 98%Household composition
- 36%Racial/ethnic minority
- 67%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 34%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 135Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.58%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.1%Peak (2014)
- 5Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 25% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little India. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.6%Food insecurity
- 9.7%SNAP enrollment
- 6.0%Transit barriers
- 6.5%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 26.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Little India
The dominant input is local political climate at 8.5/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.5/10.
Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 45.6% across Cook County. It sits 0.9 points above the Cook County average of 6.1.
The filing record is not thin: 135 evictions over 15 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2014 at 3.1% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 1.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #12,919 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031020301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031020301?
Census tract 17031020301 in the Little India neighborhood scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031020301?
Median gross rent is $1,341/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031020301?
13.2% of residents in tract 17031020301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,432.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031020301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 98th, minority 36th, housing 67th.
Q5
Is tract 17031020301 considered part of Little India?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031020301 fall within Little India (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031020301?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 135 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031020301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.58% of renter households, peaking at 3.1% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031020301 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031020301 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031020301 scores 7/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031020301 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Homan Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Vet's Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Brighton
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
South Lynn
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Smith Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Kelvyn Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
K-Town Historic District
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
East Hyde Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related