Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally

Kosciuszko Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago

Tract 17031220702 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,959 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 17031220702 covers part of the Kosciuszko Park area of Chicago, IL, and scores 6.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,959. The dominant input is local political climate at 8.5/10.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 40% Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units1,657
Renter share67.8%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate13.4%
Median income$80,452

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Kosciuszko Park
Elevated
Within parent city
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#456 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Moderate
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#526 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Elevated
Within state
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#612 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.9294, -87.7242 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kosciuszko Park scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
13.4% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,415 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Kosciuszko Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kosciuszko Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.96.9This tracttract 220702Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 412Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 2.98%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2001)
  • 14Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170312207022001: 47 filings (5.02/100 renter HHs)2002: 33 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2003: 35 filings (3.74/100 renter HHs)2004: 37 filings (3.95/100 renter HHs)2005: 29 filings (3.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 23 filings (2.57/100 renter HHs)2007: 27 filings (3.02/100 renter HHs)2008: 19 filings (2.13/100 renter HHs)2009: 28 filings (3.13/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (2.32/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (3.03/100 renter HHs)2012: 27 filings (2.92/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (2.49/100 renter HHs)2014: 20 filings (2.16/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (1.51/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 70% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Kosciuszko Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kosciuszko Park

The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. 68% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.

Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 412 filings here across 15 tracked years. Cost burden runs 41% here against 45.6% across Cook County.

Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. Filings peaked in 2001 at 5.0% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 3.0% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 84th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031220702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031220702?

Census tract 17031220702 in the Kosciuszko Park neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031220702?

Median gross rent is $1,415/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031220702?

13.4% of residents in tract 17031220702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,959.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031220702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 7th, minority 73th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 17031220702 considered part of Kosciuszko Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031220702 fall within Kosciuszko Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031220702?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 412 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031220702 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.98% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031220702 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031220702 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031220702 scores 6.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031220702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related