Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally
Pulaski Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Chicago
Tract 17031240200 · Cook County, IL · pop 1,966 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 5.7/10 for census tract 17031240200 reflects conditions in the Pulaski Park area of Chicago, Illinois. That is riskier than roughly 65% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 37% of renter households, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,938 monthly, set against $172,019 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 34% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 22%
Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units805
Renter share34.4%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$172,019
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
9
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
33
th percentile
Low
Within state
51
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.9124, -87.6702 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pulaski Park scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,938 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Pulaski Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 40%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 57%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 92Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.28%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.5%Peak (2002)
- 5Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 55% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Pulaski Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.2%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.9%Food insecurity
- 7.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 7.0%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 18.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pulaski Park
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chicago eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cook County average of 5.7 and in line with the Illinois statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 92 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 1.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.5% of renter households in 2002.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031240200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031240200?
Census tract 17031240200 in the Pulaski Park neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031240200?
Median gross rent is $1,938/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031240200?
7.1% of residents in tract 17031240200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,966.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031240200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 40th, minority 52th, housing 57th.
Q5
Is tract 17031240200 considered part of Pulaski Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031240200 fall within Pulaski Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031240200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 92 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031240200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.28% of renter households, peaking at 4.5% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031240200 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031240200 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031240200 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Chicago at 5.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031240200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Ridgeland
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Altgeld Gardens
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Philip Murray Homes
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Becks Park
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Ridgeland
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Pacific Junction
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
North Kenwood
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · IL
Homan Square
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Related