Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,320 of 84,120 nationally

Indian Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago

Tract 17031410100 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,251 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 7.5/10, tract 17031410100 in the Indian Village area of Chicago, IL reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 60% here against 45.6% across Cook County.

Risk score
7.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 51% Stable renters 33% Owners 16%
Tract context
Occupied units1,428
Renter share83.8%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$58,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Indian Village
Very Low
Within parent city
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#369 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Moderate
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#403 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Elevated
Within state
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#435 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chicago and the region

Centroid at 41.8016, -87.5810 · click any tract to drill in

Why Indian Village scores 7.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,552 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5

How Indian Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Indian Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.57.5This tracttract 410100Chicago: 6.76.7Chicagoparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 496Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 3.67%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.4%Peak (2002)
  • 25Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170314101002001: 56 filings (5.54/100 renter HHs)2002: 65 filings (6.44/100 renter HHs)2003: 39 filings (3.86/100 renter HHs)2004: 43 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2005: 19 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)2006: 35 filings (4.11/100 renter HHs)2007: 33 filings (3.87/100 renter HHs)2008: 40 filings (4.69/100 renter HHs)2009: 33 filings (3.87/100 renter HHs)2010: 16 filings (1.86/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (3.41/100 renter HHs)2012: 23 filings (2.80/100 renter HHs)2013: 16 filings (1.95/100 renter HHs)2014: 25 filings (3.05/100 renter HHs)2015: 25 filings (3.05/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 55% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Indian Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Indian Village

This is renter territory: 84% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. It sits 1.4 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10.

Court records carry 496 eviction filings across 15 observed years. The worst year on record was 2002, when 6.4% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 3.7% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031410100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031410100?

Census tract 17031410100 in the Indian Village neighborhood scores 7.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031410100?

Median gross rent is $1,552/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031410100?

15.0% of residents in tract 17031410100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,251.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031410100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 1th, minority 77th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 17031410100 considered part of Indian Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031410100 fall within Indian Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031410100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 496 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031410100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.67% of renter households, peaking at 6.4% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031410100 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031410100 compare to Chicago overall?

Tract 17031410100 scores 7.5/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 17031410100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chicago

Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related