Tract 17031570100 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 1,421 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 7.9/10, tract 17031570100 in the Corwith area of Chicago, IL reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,421 residents. Cost burden runs 22% here against 45.6% across Cook County.
Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 21%Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units442
Renter share26.7%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate23.6%
Median income$73,462
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60th percentile
#3 of 6 tracts In Corwith
Elevated
Within parent city
62th percentile
#301 of 792 tracts In Chicago
Elevated
Within county
77th percentile
#314 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
High
Within state
90th percentile
#327 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8162, -87.7189 · click any tract to drill in
Why Corwith scores 7.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
23.6% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,262 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Corwith compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
85%Socioeconomic
76%Household composition
89%Racial/ethnic minority
35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
1%Grade C
17%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
30Total filings over 13 yrs
1.71%Avg annual filing rate
4.8%Peak (2009)
1Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2015
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 15 months.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
25.7%Housing insecurity
12.8%Utility-shutoff threat
33.6%Food insecurity
26.0%SNAP enrollment
14.3%Transit barriers
27.4%No health insurance
16.0%Frequent mental distress
33.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Corwith
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 8.5/10. It sits 1.8 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. Food insecurity runs 33.6% against 17.8% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.2/10. SNAP participation runs 26.0% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 30 evictions over 13 years of observation.
At $1,262 a month, rents run 12% under what the rest of Chicago commands. The worst year on record was 2009, when 4.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031570100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031570100?
Census tract 17031570100 in the Corwith neighborhood scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031570100?
Median gross rent is $1,262/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031570100?
23.6% of residents in tract 17031570100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,421.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031570100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 76th, minority 89th, housing 35th.
Q5
Is tract 17031570100 considered part of Corwith?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031570100 fall within Corwith (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031570100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 30 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 17031570100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.71% of renter households, peaking at 4.8% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031570100 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031570100 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031570100 scores 7.9/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031570100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 17% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.