South Brighton Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031610400 · Cook County, IL · pop 1,888 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 17031610400 covers part of the South Brighton area of Chicago, IL, and scores 8.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,888 residents. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8104, -87.6674 · click any tract to drill in
Why South Brighton scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow South Brighton compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 98%Socioeconomic
- 86%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 28%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 120Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.72%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.0%Peak (2012)
- 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within South Brighton. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 31.0%Housing insecurity
- 15.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.0%Food insecurity
- 30.0%SNAP enrollment
- 16.8%Transit barriers
- 32.5%No health insurance
- 17.1%Frequent mental distress
- 34.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in South Brighton
58% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Cook County average of 45.6%. Annualized rent equals 36% of average household income of $35,938, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. SNAP participation runs 30.0% against 15.2% nationally. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
At $1,074 a month, rents run 25% under what the rest of Chicago commands. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The filing record is not thin: 120 evictions over 15 years of observation.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2012 at 3.0% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 17031610400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031610400?
What is the average rent in tract 17031610400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031610400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031610400?
Is tract 17031610400 considered part of South Brighton?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031610400?
What share of households in tract 17031610400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031610400 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031610400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.