Garfield Manor Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031630400 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,003 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
17031630400 is a census tract in the Garfield Manor area of Chicago, IL. It scores 6.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 6,003 residents. Food insecurity runs 39.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7973, -87.6988 · click any tract to drill in
Why Garfield Manor scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Garfield Manor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 81%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 45%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 272Total filings over 15 yrs
- 2.43%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.3%Peak (2015)
- 38Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Garfield Manor. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 30.9%Housing insecurity
- 15.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.4%Food insecurity
- 29.8%SNAP enrollment
- 16.6%Transit barriers
- 33.4%No health insurance
- 17.2%Frequent mental distress
- 34.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Garfield Manor
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.1/10. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 57% of renters here are cost-burdened. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 29.8% against 15.2% nationally. At $1,079 a month, rents run 25% under what the rest of Chicago commands.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 272 filings here across 15 tracked years.
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points. Filings peaked in 2015 at 4.3% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 2.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #13,349 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 17031630400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031630400?
What is the average rent in tract 17031630400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031630400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031630400?
Is tract 17031630400 considered part of Garfield Manor?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031630400?
What share of households in tract 17031630400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031630400 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031630400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.