Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally

Forest River Eviction Risk: Lower , Mount Prospect

Tract 17031802702 · Cook County, IL · pop 5,043 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 3.8/10, tract 17031802702 in the Forest River area of Mount Prospect, IL reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,043. At $409 a month, rents run 73% under what the rest of Mount Prospect commands.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 10% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,593
Renter share26.1%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate10.4%
Median income$104,926

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Forest River
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 9 tracts In Mount Prospect
High
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#1,138 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#2,285 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mount Prospect and the region

Centroid at 42.0743, -87.9076 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest River scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mount Prospect
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
10.4% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$409 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Prospect
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Prospect
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Prospect
4.8

How Forest River compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forest River risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 802702Mount Prospect: 4.64.6Mount Prospectparent cityCounty: 6.16.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.15.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 61Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 1.50%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.5%Peak (2013)
  • 8Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318027022001: 3 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2002: 1 filings (0.34/100 renter HHs)2003: 4 filings (1.37/100 renter HHs)2004: 4 filings (1.37/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (1.07/100 renter HHs)2006: 1 filings (0.36/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (1.43/100 renter HHs)2009: 10 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2010: 2 filings (0.58/100 renter HHs)2011: 4 filings (1.15/100 renter HHs)2012: 5 filings (1.44/100 renter HHs)2013: 12 filings (3.45/100 renter HHs)2014: 8 filings (2.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Forest River. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest River

Cost burden runs 60% here against 45.6% across Cook County. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10.

It sits 2.3 points below the Cook County average of 6.1. 22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Sitting well above the midpoint, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.6/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 61 filings here across 13 tracked years. SNAP participation runs 7.6% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 10.3% against 17.8% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2013, when 3.5% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.5% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #52,479 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031802702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031802702?

Census tract 17031802702 in the Forest River neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031802702?

Median gross rent is $409/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031802702?

10.4% of residents in tract 17031802702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,043.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031802702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 72th, minority 57th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 17031802702 considered part of Forest River?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031802702 fall within Forest River (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031802702?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 61 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 17031802702 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.50% of renter households, peaking at 3.5% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 17031802702 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 17031802702 compare to Mount Prospect overall?

Tract 17031802702 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Mount Prospect at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Prospect eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mount Prospect

Top eight tracts in Mount Prospect ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related