Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally
Pierces Park Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031834300 · Cook County, IL · pop 6,186 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi
Tract 17031834300 sits in the Pierces Park area of Chicago eviction risk, IL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.1/10. It is home to 6,186 residents. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,571
Renter share32.2%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate18.7%
Median income$52,425
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
98
th percentile
Very High
Within county
82
th percentile
High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.7458, -87.5918 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pierces Park scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chicago
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
18.7% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$928 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chicago
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chicago
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chicago
6.5
How Pierces Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 83
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 80%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 100%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 60%Grade B
- 8%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 969Total filings over 15 yrs
- 9.35%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.3%Peak (2004)
- 65Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 28% over the past 15 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.4%Housing insecurity
- 14.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.1%Food insecurity
- 27.2%SNAP enrollment
- 12.8%Transit barriers
- 8.1%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 31.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pierces Park
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. At $928 a month, rents run 36% under what the rest of Chicago commands.
58% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Cook County average of 45.6%. Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.
On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. SNAP participation runs 27.2% against 15.2% nationally.
The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Court records carry 969 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2004 at 17.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 9.4% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031834300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031834300?
Census tract 17031834300 in the Pierces Park neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031834300?
Median gross rent is $928/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031834300?
18.7% of residents in tract 17031834300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,186.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031834300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 80th, minority 100th, housing 61th.
Q5
Is tract 17031834300 considered part of Pierces Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031834300 fall within Pierces Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031834300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 969 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031834300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.35% of renter households, peaking at 17.3% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031834300 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031834300 compare to Chicago overall?
Tract 17031834300 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Chicago at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chicago eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031834300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · IL
Essex
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
New Auburn
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Roosevelt Square
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Little India
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Southport Corridor
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Central Park
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Forest Hill
8.1
/ 10 · High
Tract · IL
Canaryville
8.1
/ 10 · High
Related