South Branch Addition Eviction Risk: Elevated , Chicago
Tract 17031839800 · Cook County, IL · pop 2,662 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
17031839800 is a census tract in the South Branch Addition area of Chicago, IL. It scores 7.3/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,662 residents. The dominant input is local political climate at 8.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8351, -87.6432 · click any tract to drill in
Why South Branch Addition scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow South Branch Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 90%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 168Total filings over 15 yrs
- 1.50%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.3%Peak (2012)
- 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within South Branch Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.2%Housing insecurity
- 7.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.1%Food insecurity
- 13.7%SNAP enrollment
- 8.3%Transit barriers
- 10.9%No health insurance
- 14.2%Frequent mental distress
- 23.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in South Branch Addition
The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. 69% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
It sits 1.2 points above the Cook County average of 6.1. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. The filing record is not thin: 168 evictions over 15 years of observation.
The worst year on record was 2012, when 2.3% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 1.5% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 87th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.4/10. Statewide the IL average is 5.1, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 17031839800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031839800?
What is the average rent in tract 17031839800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031839800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031839800?
Is tract 17031839800 considered part of South Branch Addition?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031839800?
What share of households in tract 17031839800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031839800 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031839800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.