Douglass Park Eviction Risk: High , Chicago
Tract 17031843100 · Cook County, IL · pop 1,564 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
With a score of 8.1/10, tract 17031843100 in the Douglass Park area of Chicago, IL reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,564. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chicago and the region
Centroid at 41.8626, -87.6995 · click any tract to drill in
Why Douglass Park scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Douglass Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 91
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 77%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 14%Grade C
- 22%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 368Total filings over 15 yrs
- 5.73%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.5%Peak (2002)
- 27Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Douglass Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 30.3%Housing insecurity
- 20.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 37.1%Food insecurity
- 38.8%SNAP enrollment
- 17.8%Transit barriers
- 12.7%No health insurance
- 19.3%Frequent mental distress
- 33.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Douglass Park
SNAP participation runs 38.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 37.1% against 17.8% nationally.
Cost burden runs 57% here against 45.6% across Cook County. The dominant input is local political climate at 8.5/10.
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points. 72% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
The poverty rate is 28%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.
Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.3/10. Court records carry 368 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
At $1,282 a month, rents run 11% under what the rest of Chicago commands. The worst year on record was 2002, when 8.5% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 5.7% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 91st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 17031843100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031843100?
What is the average rent in tract 17031843100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031843100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031843100?
Is tract 17031843100 considered part of Douglass Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031843100?
What share of households in tract 17031843100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 17031843100 compare to Chicago overall?
Was tract 17031843100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Chicago
Top eight tracts in Chicago ranked by composite eviction-risk score.