Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally

Grand Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Hammond

Tract 18089021100 · Lake County, IN · pop 3,224 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 18089021100 covers part of the Grand Park area of Hammond, IN, and scores 4.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 62%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 5% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,085
Renter share16.9%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate14.7%
Median income$60,120

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Grand Park
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 19 tracts In Hammond
Moderate
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#62 of 131 tracts In Lake County
Moderate
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#476 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hammond and the region

Centroid at 41.5767, -87.4558 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grand Park scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hammond
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.7% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,426 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hammond
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hammond
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hammond
7.3

How Grand Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Grand Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.5This tracttract 0211004.0Hammondparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 68

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Grand Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grand Park

roughly three in four of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the Lake County average of 43.0%. The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.7/10.

At $1,426 a month, rents run 26% over what the rest of Hammond commands. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2/10.

Food insecurity runs 29.8% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10. The voucher gap is 19.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 16.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 51st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 7.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Lake County average of 4.4 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 18089021100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18089021100?

Census tract 18089021100 in the Grand Park neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18089021100?

Median gross rent is $1,426/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18089021100?

14.7% of residents in tract 18089021100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,224.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18089021100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 95th, minority 71th, housing 21th.
Q5

Is tract 18089021100 considered part of Grand Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18089021100 fall within Grand Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 18089021100 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 18089021100 compare to Hammond overall?

Tract 18089021100 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Hammond at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hammond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 18089021100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hammond

Top eight tracts in Hammond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related