Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally

Grand Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Hammond

Tract 18089022000 · Lake County, IN · pop 4,804 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 4.4/10, tract 18089022000 in the Grand Park area of Hammond, IN reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,804 residents. Cost burden runs 62% here against 43.0% across Lake County.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 17% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,719
Renter share44.0%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate11.8%
Median income$52,762

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Grand Park
Very Low
Within parent city
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 19 tracts In Hammond
Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#66 of 131 tracts In Lake County
Moderate
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#509 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hammond and the region

Centroid at 41.5802, -87.4419 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grand Park scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hammond
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
11.8% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,093 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hammond
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hammond
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hammond
7.3

How Grand Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Grand Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.4This tracttract 0220004.0Hammondparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Grand Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grand Park

The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.7/10. 20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 17.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Housing insecurity runs 21.7% against 14.2% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #42,813 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Lake County average of 4.4 closely. Average gross rent is $1,093, close to the Hammond average.

Annual rent works out to 25% of average household income of $52,762. 44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 18089022000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18089022000?

Census tract 18089022000 in the Grand Park neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18089022000?

Median gross rent is $1,093/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18089022000?

11.8% of residents in tract 18089022000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,804.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18089022000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 84th, minority 72th, housing 76th.
Q5

Is tract 18089022000 considered part of Grand Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18089022000 fall within Grand Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 18089022000 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 18089022000 compare to Hammond overall?

Tract 18089022000 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Hammond at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hammond eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 18089022000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Hammond

Top eight tracts in Hammond ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related