Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Canterbury-Chatard Eviction Risk: Lower , Indianapolis

Tract 18097321700 · Marion County, IN · pop 4,283 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 18097321700 runs through the Canterbury-Chatard neighborhood of Indianapolis city (balance). With 4,283 residents, it scores 5.5/10 for landlords. It lands near the 57th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 77% of renter households, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,466 monthly, set against $108,429 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 7% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,924
Renter share28.7%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate7.7%
Median income$108,429

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Canterbury-Chatard
Very Low
Within parent city
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#210 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Very Low
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#225 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Very Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1,201 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.8532, -86.1284 · click any tract to drill in

Why Canterbury-Chatard scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
7.7% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,466 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Canterbury-Chatard compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Canterbury-Chatard risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 321700Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 251Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.29×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (4.80× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 9 filings (7.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 10 filings (6.67× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (4.57× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (3.43× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Canterbury-Chatard. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Canterbury-Chatard

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 20th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097321700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097321700?

Census tract 18097321700 in the Canterbury-Chatard neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097321700?

Median gross rent is $1,466/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 77% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097321700?

7.7% of residents in tract 18097321700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,283.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097321700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 2th, minority 33th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 18097321700 considered part of Canterbury-Chatard?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097321700 fall within Canterbury-Chatard (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097321700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.29× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097321700 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097321700 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097321700 scores 2.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097321700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related