Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Canterbury-Chatard Eviction Risk: Lower , Indianapolis

Tract 18097322400 · Marion County, IN · pop 2,734 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

For landlords sizing up Canterbury-Chatard in Indianapolis city (balance), census tract 18097322400 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. That is riskier than roughly 50% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 53% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $952 monthly, set against $57,109 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 48% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 23% Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,612
Renter share47.6%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$57,109

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Canterbury-Chatard
Very High
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#139 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Moderate
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#137 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Moderate
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#675 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.8439, -86.1310 · click any tract to drill in

Why Canterbury-Chatard scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$952 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Canterbury-Chatard compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Canterbury-Chatard risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 322400Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 320Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 8.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.49×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (0.85× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (0.45× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.34× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (0.68× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-04-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.51× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-02-01: 12 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-06-01: 10 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (1.23× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.18× baseline)2025-09-01: 13 filings (2.08× baseline)2025-10-01: 10 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-12-01: 8 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Canterbury-Chatard. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Canterbury-Chatard

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097322400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097322400?

Census tract 18097322400 in the Canterbury-Chatard neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097322400?

Median gross rent is $952/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097322400?

8.6% of residents in tract 18097322400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,734.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097322400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 7th, minority 58th, housing 6th.
Q5

Is tract 18097322400 considered part of Canterbury-Chatard?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097322400 fall within Canterbury-Chatard (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097322400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.49× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097322400 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097322400 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097322400 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097322400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related