Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Spades Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Indianapolis

Tract 18097352700 · Marion County, IN · pop 2,600 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

The Spades Park neighborhood of Indianapolis city (balance) is where census tract 18097352700 sits, home to 2,600 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.5/10. On the national scale it ranks #35,856 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,188 a month while the average household earns $53,142 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 31% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 13% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units935
Renter share31.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$53,142

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Spades Park
Very Low
Within parent city
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#126 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Moderate
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#128 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Moderate
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#636 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7866, -86.1255 · click any tract to drill in

Why Spades Park scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,188 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Spades Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Spades Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 352700Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 339Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 8.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.52×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 14 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 10 filings (1.18× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (0.98× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-01-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.69× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-07-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (1.16× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (0.61× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (0.49× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.35× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.41× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-07-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.35× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-07-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.27× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Spades Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Spades Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 79th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of C ("Hazardous") across 50% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097352700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097352700?

Census tract 18097352700 in the Spades Park neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097352700?

Median gross rent is $1,188/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097352700?

9.5% of residents in tract 18097352700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,600.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097352700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 86th, minority 57th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 18097352700 considered part of Spades Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097352700 fall within Spades Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097352700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.52× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097352700 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097352700 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097352700 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097352700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 50% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related