Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Spades Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Indianapolis

Tract 18097352800 · Marion County, IN · pop 1,461 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 18097352800 covers Spades Park in Indianapolis city (balance), home to 1,461 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 75% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 46% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $959 a month while the average household earns $38,158 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 81% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 44% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units714
Renter share81.4%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate32.1%
Median income$38,158

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Spades Park
Very High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#36 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
High
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 253 tracts In Marion County
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#163 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7951, -86.1298 · click any tract to drill in

Why Spades Park scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
32.1% poverty · this tract
8.0
Supply constraint
$959 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Spades Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Spades Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 352800Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 645Total filings 2020-21
  • 8.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.26×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 13 filings (1.73× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-10-01: 13 filings (1.53× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-02-01: 10 filings (1.82× baseline)2021-03-01: 8 filings (1.88× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-05-01: 8 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (1.03× baseline)2021-07-01: 6 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-09-01: 17 filings (2.43× baseline)2021-10-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (1.47× baseline)2022-01-01: 14 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (2.18× baseline)2022-03-01: 17 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 17 filings (2.72× baseline)2022-05-01: 15 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-06-01: 12 filings (1.37× baseline)2022-07-01: 11 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 17 filings (1.79× baseline)2022-09-01: 15 filings (2.14× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-11-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-12-01: 10 filings (2.11× baseline)2023-01-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2023-04-01: 14 filings (2.24× baseline)2023-05-01: 12 filings (1.37× baseline)2023-06-01: 14 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (0.85× baseline)2023-08-01: 15 filings (1.58× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2023-11-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (1.74× baseline)2024-03-01: 23 filings (5.41× baseline)2024-04-01: 10 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-05-01: 12 filings (1.37× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-07-01: 13 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-08-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (1.41× baseline)2024-11-01: 11 filings (1.83× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-02-01: 10 filings (1.82× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (1.41× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-05-01: 13 filings (1.49× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (0.97× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (2.11× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Spades Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Spades Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 23.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 19.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.26x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097352800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097352800?

Census tract 18097352800 in the Spades Park neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097352800?

Median gross rent is $959/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097352800?

32.1% of residents in tract 18097352800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,461.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097352800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 53th, minority 85th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 18097352800 considered part of Spades Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097352800 fall within Spades Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097352800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.26× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097352800 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097352800 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097352800 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097352800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related