Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Christian Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Indianapolis

Tract 18097355500 · Marion County, IN · pop 4,229 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 18097355500 belongs to Christian Park in Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana. It is home to 4,229 residents and scores 5.1/10, a moderate reading for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #48,282 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

35% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,013 a month against an average household income of $51,968 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 31% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 20% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,498
Renter share31.2%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate16.3%
Median income$51,968

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Christian Park
Very Low
Within parent city
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#97 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Elevated
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#100 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Elevated
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#440 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7597, -86.0924 · click any tract to drill in

Why Christian Park scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
16.3% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,013 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Christian Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Christian Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 355500Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 349Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.77×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-08-01: 9 filings (1.57× baseline)2020-09-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2020-11-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-08-01: 10 filings (1.74× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (1.88× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 9 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (1.22× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (1.12× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 11 filings (1.76× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Christian Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Christian Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 59th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097355500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097355500?

Census tract 18097355500 in the Christian Park neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097355500?

Median gross rent is $1,013/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097355500?

16.3% of residents in tract 18097355500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,229.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097355500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 81th, minority 43th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 18097355500 considered part of Christian Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097355500 fall within Christian Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097355500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.77× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097355500 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097355500 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097355500 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097355500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 5% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related