Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Christian Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Indianapolis

Tract 18097357400 · Marion County, IN · pop 5,084 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

How risky is the Christian Park neighborhood of Indianapolis city (balance) for landlords? Census tract 18097357400 scores 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $959 monthly, set against $31,406 in average yearly household income, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 17% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,602
Renter share43.1%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate39.0%
Median income$31,406

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Christian Park
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7455, -86.0975 · click any tract to drill in

Why Christian Park scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
39.0% poverty · this tract
9.8
Supply constraint
$959 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Christian Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Christian Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 357400Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 437Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.73×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 7 filings (0.74× baseline)2020-02-01: 10 filings (1.54× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-09-01: 13 filings (1.93× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (0.74× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-08-01: 9 filings (0.97× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-03-01: 12 filings (1.30× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (1.08× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (1.03× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-09-01: 14 filings (2.07× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-07-01: 18 filings (2.06× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-11-01: 10 filings (0.95× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 10 filings (1.08× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (1.19× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-01-01: 7 filings (0.74× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (0.97× baseline)2025-04-01: 9 filings (1.38× baseline)2025-05-01: 9 filings (0.97× baseline)2025-06-01: 9 filings (1.16× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (0.65× baseline)2025-09-01: 12 filings (1.78× baseline)2025-10-01: 8 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2026-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Christian Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Christian Park

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 88th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.73x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097357400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097357400?

Census tract 18097357400 in the Christian Park neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097357400?

Median gross rent is $959/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097357400?

39.0% of residents in tract 18097357400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,084.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097357400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 98th, minority 73th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 18097357400 considered part of Christian Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097357400 fall within Christian Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097357400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.73× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097357400 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097357400 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097357400 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097357400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 42% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related