Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Little Flower Eviction Risk: Moderate , Indianapolis

Tract 18097360900 · Marion County, IN · pop 5,851 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 18097360900 sits in Little Flower in Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), Indiana eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 6.1/10. That is riskier than about 78% of US census tracts.

64% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 43% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $941 a month while the average household earns $39,911 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 17% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units2,349
Renter share47.2%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate34.9%
Median income$39,911

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Little Flower
Very High
Within parent city
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Very High
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Very High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#62 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7889, -86.0738 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Flower scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
34.9% poverty · this tract
8.7
Supply constraint
$941 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Little Flower compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Flower risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 360900Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 957Total filings 2020-21
  • 12.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 21.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 20 filings (0.78× baseline)2020-02-01: 17 filings (0.99× baseline)2020-03-01: 8 filings (0.52× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.05× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.08× baseline)2020-08-01: 15 filings (0.61× baseline)2020-09-01: 15 filings (0.52× baseline)2020-10-01: 7 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-11-01: 8 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-12-01: 15 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-01-01: 12 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (0.35× baseline)2021-03-01: 9 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.13× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-07-01: 10 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-09-01: 11 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-10-01: 16 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-11-01: 14 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 9 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-01-01: 10 filings (0.39× baseline)2022-02-01: 7 filings (0.41× baseline)2022-03-01: 7 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-06-01: 14 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 17 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-08-01: 17 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-09-01: 19 filings (0.66× baseline)2022-10-01: 10 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-11-01: 12 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-12-01: 10 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-01-01: 21 filings (0.82× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (0.23× baseline)2023-03-01: 12 filings (0.79× baseline)2023-04-01: 17 filings (0.87× baseline)2023-05-01: 13 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-06-01: 26 filings (0.94× baseline)2023-07-01: 16 filings (0.61× baseline)2023-08-01: 21 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-09-01: 24 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-10-01: 21 filings (0.76× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-12-01: 21 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-01-01: 13 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (0.58× baseline)2024-03-01: 9 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-04-01: 14 filings (0.72× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-06-01: 20 filings (0.72× baseline)2024-07-01: 25 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-08-01: 16 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-09-01: 16 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-10-01: 18 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-11-01: 14 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 22 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-01-01: 13 filings (0.51× baseline)2025-02-01: 18 filings (1.04× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-04-01: 17 filings (0.87× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (0.34× baseline)2025-06-01: 20 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-07-01: 17 filings (0.65× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.12× baseline)2025-09-01: 19 filings (0.66× baseline)2025-10-01: 8 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-11-01: 6 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (0.42× baseline)2026-01-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Flower. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Flower

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 8.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 50% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097360900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097360900?

Census tract 18097360900 in the Little Flower neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097360900?

Median gross rent is $941/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097360900?

34.9% of residents in tract 18097360900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,851.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097360900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 96th, minority 63th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 18097360900 considered part of Little Flower?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097360900 fall within Little Flower (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097360900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097360900 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097360900 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097360900 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097360900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 50% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related