Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Watermark Eviction Risk: Lower , Indianapolis

Tract 18097391002 · Marion County, IN · pop 5,735 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Eviction risk in Watermark in Indianapolis city (balance) centers on tract 18097391002, which scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 5,735 residents. On the national scale it ranks #35,869 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 35% of renter households, a high level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,719 a month against an average household income of $97,446 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 89% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 58% Owners 11%
Tract context
Occupied units3,605
Renter share89.3%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate19.8%
Median income$97,446

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Watermark
Very Low
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#129 of 231 tracts In Indianapolis
Moderate
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 253 tracts In Marion County
Moderate
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#636 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Indianapolis and the region

Centroid at 39.7751, -86.1607 · click any tract to drill in

Why Watermark scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
19.8% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,719 rent vs county FMR
8.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Indianapolis
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Indianapolis
6.8

How Watermark compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Watermark risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 391002Indianapolis: 2.72.7Indianapolisparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 910Total filings 2020-21
  • 11.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 7.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.63×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (1.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-09-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-01-01: 11 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-02-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 27 filings (2.77× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-07-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-08-01: 13 filings (1.37× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-10-01: 12 filings (1.85× baseline)2021-11-01: 20 filings (2.35× baseline)2021-12-01: 23 filings (5.11× baseline)2022-01-01: 8 filings (0.78× baseline)2022-02-01: 18 filings (3.13× baseline)2022-03-01: 13 filings (1.73× baseline)2022-04-01: 15 filings (2.07× baseline)2022-05-01: 13 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-07-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 16 filings (1.68× baseline)2022-09-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2022-11-01: 12 filings (1.41× baseline)2022-12-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-02-01: 15 filings (2.61× baseline)2023-03-01: 10 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 19 filings (2.62× baseline)2023-05-01: 18 filings (1.85× baseline)2023-06-01: 19 filings (2.11× baseline)2023-07-01: 23 filings (3.07× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-09-01: 16 filings (2.29× baseline)2023-10-01: 18 filings (2.77× baseline)2023-11-01: 18 filings (2.12× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (3.11× baseline)2024-01-01: 17 filings (1.66× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-03-01: 16 filings (2.13× baseline)2024-04-01: 13 filings (1.79× baseline)2024-05-01: 15 filings (1.54× baseline)2024-06-01: 14 filings (1.56× baseline)2024-07-01: 22 filings (2.93× baseline)2024-08-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2024-09-01: 14 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 14 filings (2.15× baseline)2024-11-01: 17 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 16 filings (3.56× baseline)2025-01-01: 13 filings (1.27× baseline)2025-02-01: 13 filings (2.26× baseline)2025-03-01: 19 filings (2.53× baseline)2025-04-01: 10 filings (1.38× baseline)2025-05-01: 17 filings (1.74× baseline)2025-06-01: 20 filings (2.22× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-09-01: 14 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (1.38× baseline)2025-11-01: 17 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 12 filings (2.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Indianapolis, IN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Watermark. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Watermark

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk city (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Marion County average of 5.4 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.63x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18097391002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18097391002?

Census tract 18097391002 in the Watermark neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18097391002?

Median gross rent is $1,719/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18097391002?

19.8% of residents in tract 18097391002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,735.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18097391002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 1th, minority 46th, housing 81th.
Q5

Is tract 18097391002 considered part of Watermark?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18097391002 fall within Watermark (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 18097391002 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.63× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Indianapolis eviction risk, IN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 18097391002 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 18097391002 compare to Indianapolis overall?

Tract 18097391002 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Indianapolis at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Indianapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 18097391002 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 20% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Indianapolis

Top eight tracts in Indianapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related