Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Miami Village Eviction Risk: Lower , South Bend

Tract 18141003200 · St. Joseph County, IN · pop 5,354 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 18141003200, home to 5,354 residents in the Miami Village area of South Bend, scores 4.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 29th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,157 a month while the average household earns $78,688 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 7% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 4% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,997
Renter share7.3%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$78,688

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Miami Village
Very Low
Within parent city
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#40 of 47 tracts In South Bend
Very Low
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 82 tracts In St. Joseph County
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#1,062 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across South Bend and the region

Centroid at 41.6403, -86.2252 · click any tract to drill in

Why Miami Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from South Bend
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,157 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Bend
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Bend
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Bend
2.5

How Miami Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Miami Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 003200South Bend: 2.62.6South Bendparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 13Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 5.99%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.0%Peak (2015)
  • 13Filings in 2015 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 58Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.61×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Richmond, VA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Miami Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Miami Village

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 5.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from South Bend eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the St. Joseph County average of 5.2 and in line with the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 13 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 6.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.0% of renter households in 2015.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18141003200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18141003200?

Census tract 18141003200 in the Miami Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18141003200?

Median gross rent is $1,157/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18141003200?

4.6% of residents in tract 18141003200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,354.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18141003200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 68th, minority 49th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 18141003200 considered part of Miami Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18141003200 fall within Miami Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 18141003200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 18141003200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.99% of renter households, peaking at 6.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 18141003200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Richmond eviction risk, VA), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 18141003200 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 18141003200 compare to South Bend overall?

Tract 18141003200 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of South Bend at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Bend eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 18141003200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in South Bend

Top eight tracts in South Bend ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related