Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Countryside Eviction Risk: Lower , Mission

Tract 20091050700 · Johnson County, KS · pop 4,399 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 20091050700 covers part of the Countryside area of Fairway, KS, and scores 3.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,399. 9% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Johnson County average of 38.5%.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 11% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,876
Renter share12.4%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$123,676

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Countryside
Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Mission
Moderate
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#84 of 154 tracts In Johnson County
Moderate
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#534 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mission and the region

Centroid at 39.0148, -94.6381 · click any tract to drill in

Why Countryside scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,618 rent vs county FMR
7.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mission
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mission
4.8

How Countryside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Countryside risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.1This tracttract 0507004.1Missionparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Countryside

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.3/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2/10. Food insecurity runs 4.7% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 2.3% against 15.2% nationally. The voucher gap is 20.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.3/10. Average gross rent is $1,618, 17% below the Fairway average. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Greater Kansas City. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #65,414 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $123,676, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 20091050700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050700?

Census tract 20091050700 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 20091050700?

Median gross rent is $1,618/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050700?

5.2% of residents in tract 20091050700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,399.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 6th, minority 14th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 20091050700 considered part of Countryside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050700 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 20091050700 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 20091050700 compare to Mission overall?

Tract 20091050700 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Mission at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 20091050700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related