Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #62,129 of 84,120 nationally
Countryside Eviction Risk: Lower , Mission
Tract 20091050700 · Johnson County, KS · pop 4,399 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
The Lower-tier score of 3.9/10 for census tract 20091050700 reflects conditions in the Countryside neighborhood of Mission, Kansas. On the national scale it ranks #75,243 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 9% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,618 monthly, set against $123,676 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,876
Renter share12.4%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$123,676
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
82
th percentile
High
Within state
81
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mission and the region
Centroid at 39.0148, -94.6381 · click any tract to drill in
Why Countryside scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,618 rent vs county FMR
7.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mission
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mission
4.8
How Countryside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 10%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 11%Grade A
- 13%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.7%Food insecurity
- 2.3%SNAP enrollment
- 3.4%Transit barriers
- 4.4%No health insurance
- 11.9%Frequent mental distress
- 21.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Countryside
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mission eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Johnson County average of 3.9 and below the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 20091050700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050700?
Census tract 20091050700 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20091050700?
Median gross rent is $1,618/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050700?
5.2% of residents in tract 20091050700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,399.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 6th, minority 14th, housing 10th.
Q5
Is tract 20091050700 considered part of Countryside?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050700 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 20091050700 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 20091050700 compare to Mission overall?
Tract 20091050700 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Mission at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 20091050700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related