Within neighborhood
75
th percentile
High
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally
Countryside Eviction Risk: Lower , Mission
Tract 20091050302 · Johnson County, KS · pop 1,887 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 4.9/10 for census tract 20091050302 reflects conditions in the Countryside area of Mission, Kansas. On the national scale it ranks #54,336 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,145 a month against an average household income of $74,583 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,155
Renter share52.3%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$74,583
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
92
th percentile
Very High
Within state
40
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mission and the region
Centroid at 39.0196, -94.6549 · click any tract to drill in
Why Countryside scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,145 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mission
3.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mission
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mission
4.6
How Countryside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 30%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 20%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.6%Housing insecurity
- 7.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.9%Food insecurity
- 6.6%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 8.8%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 34.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Countryside
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mission eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Johnson County average of 3.9 and above the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 20091050302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050302?
Census tract 20091050302 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20091050302?
Median gross rent is $1,145/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050302?
9.1% of residents in tract 20091050302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,887.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 59th, minority 39th, housing 80th.
Q5
Is tract 20091050302 considered part of Countryside?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050302 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 20091050302 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 20091050302 compare to Mission overall?
Tract 20091050302 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Mission at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 20091050302 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mission
Top eight tracts in Mission ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related