Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Countryside Eviction Risk: Moderate , Mission

Tract 20091050302 · Johnson County, KS · pop 1,887 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 5.1/10, tract 20091050302 in the Countryside area of Mission, KS reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,887 residents. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 29% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,155
Renter share52.3%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$74,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Countryside
High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Mission
Moderate
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 154 tracts In Johnson County
Very High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mission and the region

Centroid at 39.0196, -94.6549 · click any tract to drill in

Why Countryside scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,145 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mission
3.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mission
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mission
4.6

How Countryside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Countryside risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.1This tracttract 0503024.1Missionparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Countryside

24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10.

It sits 1.5 points above the Johnson County average of 3.6. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.3/10.

Against Johnson County at 38.5%, 45% of renters here are cost-burdened. SNAP participation runs 6.6% against 15.2% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.7/10.

Statewide the KS average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,145, close to the Mission average.

Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $74,583.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 20091050302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050302?

Census tract 20091050302 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 20091050302?

Median gross rent is $1,145/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050302?

9.1% of residents in tract 20091050302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,887.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 59th, minority 39th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 20091050302 considered part of Countryside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050302 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 20091050302 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 20091050302 compare to Mission overall?

Tract 20091050302 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Mission at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 20091050302 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mission

Top eight tracts in Mission ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related