Countryside Eviction Risk: Lower , Mission

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.6/10.

The voucher gap is 27.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10.

Food insecurity runs 4.6% against 17.8% nationally. The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Housing insecurity runs 5.4% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Johnson County average of 3.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Greater Kansas City. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $131,932, annual rent is just 16%.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.