Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally

Countryside Eviction Risk: Moderate , Mission

Tract 20091050301 · Johnson County, KS · pop 3,625 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

With a score of 5.5/10, tract 20091050301 in the Countryside area of Mission, KS reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,625. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 52% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units2,299
Renter share81.6%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate19.4%
Median income$58,361

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Countryside
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Mission
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 154 tracts In Johnson County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mission and the region

Centroid at 39.0337, -94.6638 · click any tract to drill in

Why Countryside scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mission
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
19.4% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,148 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mission
3.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mission
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mission
4.6

How Countryside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Countryside risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.5This tracttract 0503014.1Missionparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Countryside. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Countryside

82% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. It sits 1.9 points above the Johnson County average of 3.6.

Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10. The severe-burden share is 15%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.3/10.

The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Greater Kansas City. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 72nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 3.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the KS average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

36% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 20091050301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050301?

Census tract 20091050301 in the Countryside neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 20091050301?

Median gross rent is $1,148/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050301?

19.4% of residents in tract 20091050301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,625.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 4th, minority 42th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 20091050301 considered part of Countryside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050301 fall within Countryside (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 20091050301 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 20091050301 compare to Mission overall?

Tract 20091050301 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of Mission at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mission eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 20091050301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mission

Top eight tracts in Mission ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related