Census Tract · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally
Farmingdale Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 23011010803 ·
Kennebec County, ME · pop 2,988 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Farmingdale
Tract 23011010803 sits in Farmingdale, ME, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.6/10. Population here is 2,988. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.1/10.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%Stable renters 20%Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units1,438
Renter share40.1%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate22.0%
Median income$60,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Farmingdale
Moderate
Within county
80th percentile
#8 of 36 tracts In Kennebec County
High
Within state
83th percentile
#68 of 401 tracts In Maine
High
National
73th percentile
#22,681 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Farmingdale and the region
Centroid at 44.2605, -69.8278 · click any tract to drill in
Why Farmingdale scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Farmingdale
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Maine legislature & governorship
4.0
Economic stress
22.0% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$928 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Farmingdale
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Farmingdale
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Farmingdale
8.9
How Farmingdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.3%Housing insecurity
8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
12.4%Food insecurity
17.3%SNAP enrollment
8.7%Transit barriers
8.4%No health insurance
18.2%Frequent mental distress
36.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Farmingdale
Cost burden runs 50% here against 37.6% across Kennebec County. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.9/10.
16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against the Kennebec County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10.
The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Average gross rent is $928, 16% above the Farmingdale average. Nationally it ranks #22,681 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the ME average is 4.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points hotter. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $60,000.
40% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 23011010803
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 23011010803?
Census tract 23011010803 in Farmingdale scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 23011010803?
Median gross rent is $928/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 23011010803?
22.0% of residents in tract 23011010803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,988.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 23011010803?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 53th, minority 11th, housing 57th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 23011010803 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 23011010803 compare to Farmingdale overall?
Tract 23011010803 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Farmingdale at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Farmingdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.