Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally
Turf Valley Eviction Risk: Lower , Pasadena
Tract 24003731210 · Anne Arundel County, MD · pop 2,371 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Here is how census tract 24003731210, in the Turf Valley neighborhood of Pasadena eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.9/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 2,371. It lands near the 72nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 17% of renter households, a modest level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $95,962 a year. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units804
Renter share3.6%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$95,962
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
28
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pasadena and the region
Centroid at 39.1138, -76.5366 · click any tract to drill in
Why Turf Valley scores 2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pasadena
8.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pasadena
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pasadena
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pasadena
5.8
How Turf Valley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 14
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 30%Socioeconomic
- 4%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Turf Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.7%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.8%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 5.3%Transit barriers
- 6.2%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 27.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Turf Valley
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Anne Arundel County average of 6.4 and below the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 14th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 24003731210
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24003731210?
Census tract 24003731210 in the Turf Valley neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 24003731210?
2.5% of residents in tract 24003731210 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,371.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 24003731210?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 4th, minority 24th, housing 30th.
Q4
Is tract 24003731210 considered part of Turf Valley?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24003731210 fall within Turf Valley (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 24003731210 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 24003731210 compare to Pasadena overall?
Tract 24003731210 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Pasadena at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pasadena eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pasadena
Top eight tracts in Pasadena ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related