Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally

Provinces Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Meade

Tract 24003740602 · Anne Arundel County, MD · pop 3,424 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 24003740602 sits in Provinces in Fort Meade, Maryland eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 6.6/10. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 37% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,342 a month against an average household income of $114,792 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 100% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 63% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units1,047
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$114,792

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Provinces
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Fort Meade
Moderate
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 129 tracts In Anne Arundel County
High
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#758 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Meade and the region

Centroid at 39.1186, -76.7351 · click any tract to drill in

Why Provinces scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Meade
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,342 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Meade
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Meade
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Meade
4.6

How Provinces compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Provinces risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 740602Fort Meade: 5.85.8Fort Meadeparent cityCounty: 2.22.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Provinces. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Provinces

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Meade, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Anne Arundel County average of 6.4 and in line with the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 52nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24003740602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24003740602?

Census tract 24003740602 in the Provinces neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24003740602?

Median gross rent is $2,342/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24003740602?

6.5% of residents in tract 24003740602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,424.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24003740602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 72th, minority 80th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 24003740602 considered part of Provinces?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24003740602 fall within Provinces (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 24003740602 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 24003740602 compare to Fort Meade overall?

Tract 24003740602 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Meade at 5.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Meade; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Meade

Top eight tracts in Fort Meade ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related