Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Randolph Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Forestville

Tract 24033803519 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 6,417 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

24033803519 is a census tract in the Randolph Village area of Summerfield, MD. It scores 3.7/10 for landlords. Population here is 6,417. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 10/10.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 37% Owners 36%
Tract context
Occupied units2,689
Renter share63.9%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$100,313

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Randolph Village
Very High
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Forestville
Very Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#143 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,203 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forestville and the region

Centroid at 38.8973, -76.8586 · click any tract to drill in

Why Randolph Village scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forestville
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,178 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forestville
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forestville
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forestville
5.9

How Randolph Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Randolph Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.7This tracttract 8035194.2Forestvilleparent city4.9Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 6,015Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 131.07%Avg annual filing rate
  • 212.3%Peak (2016)
  • 2,624Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 24033803519
Filings climbed 573% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Randolph Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Randolph Village

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.4/10. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.1/10.

Against the Prince George's County average of 4.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 6,015 filings here across 4 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2016, when 212.3% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 131.1% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #54,273 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 1.8 points cooler. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 42% of renters.

Average gross rent is $2,178, close to the Summerfield average. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $100,313.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033803519

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033803519?

Census tract 24033803519 in the Randolph Village neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033803519?

Median gross rent is $2,178/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033803519?

3.8% of residents in tract 24033803519 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,417.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033803519?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 35th, minority 98th, housing 43th.
Q5

Is tract 24033803519 considered part of Randolph Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033803519 fall within Randolph Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033803519?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6,015 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033803519 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 131.07% of renter households, peaking at 212.3% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033803519 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033803519 compare to Forestville overall?

Tract 24033803519 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of Forestville at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forestville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forestville

Top eight tracts in Forestville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related