Turner Falls Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greenfield
Tract 25011041100 · Franklin County, MA · pop 3,650 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Turner Falls Historic District in Greenfield anchors census tract 25011041100, which lands at 5.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 50% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,151 a month while the average household earns $87,813 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Greenfield and the region
Centroid at 42.6179, -72.5730 · click any tract to drill in
Why Turner Falls Historic District scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Turner Falls Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 54
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 33%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 8%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 78Total filings over 13 yrs
- 1.73%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.0%Peak (2010)
- 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Turner Falls Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 9.3%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 3.7%No health insurance
- 14.6%Frequent mental distress
- 26.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Turner Falls Historic District
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Greenfield, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Franklin County average of 5.2 and below the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 54th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 25011041100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25011041100?
What is the average rent in tract 25011041100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 25011041100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 25011041100?
Is tract 25011041100 considered part of Turner Falls Historic District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25011041100?
What share of households in tract 25011041100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 25011041100 compare to Greenfield overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Greenfield
Top eight tracts in Greenfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.