Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Turner Falls Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greenfield

Tract 25011041100 · Franklin County, MA · pop 3,650 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 5.3/10, tract 25011041100 in the Turner Falls Historic District area of Greenfield, MA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Pulling hardest the other way is court filing pressure at 0.7/10.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 8% Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,607
Renter share17.1%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$87,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Turner Falls Historic District
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Greenfield
Very Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 19 tracts In Franklin County
Low
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#991 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Greenfield and the region

Centroid at 42.6179, -72.5730 · click any tract to drill in

Why Turner Falls Historic District scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Greenfield
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,151 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greenfield
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greenfield
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greenfield
7.7

How Turner Falls Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Turner Falls Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.3This tracttract 0411006.4Greenfieldparent city5.9Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 78Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 1.73%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.0%Peak (2010)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 25011041100
Filings climbed 300% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Turner Falls Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Turner Falls Historic District

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.1/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. Food insecurity runs 7.8% against 17.8% nationally.

The filing record is not thin: 78 evictions over 13 years of observation. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.7% against 11.3% nationally. It sits 0.6 points below the Franklin County average of 5.9.

The worst year on record was 2010, when 3.0% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.7% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #28,095 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.8/10.

Against average income of $87,813, annual rent is just 16%. Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 25011041100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25011041100?

Census tract 25011041100 in the Turner Falls Historic District neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25011041100?

Median gross rent is $1,151/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25011041100?

4.4% of residents in tract 25011041100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,650.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25011041100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 80th, minority 8th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 25011041100 considered part of Turner Falls Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25011041100 fall within Turner Falls Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25011041100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 78 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 25011041100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.73% of renter households, peaking at 3.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 25011041100 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 25011041100 compare to Greenfield overall?

Tract 25011041100 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Greenfield at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greenfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Greenfield

Top eight tracts in Greenfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related