Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Fields at Chestnut Eviction Risk: Lower , Longmeadow

Tract 25013813303 · Hampden County, MA · pop 4,618 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 25013813303 sits in the Fields at Chestnut area of Longmeadow, MA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 4,618 residents. Average gross rent is $423, 75% below the Longmeadow average.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 6% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,586
Renter share11.5%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$185,565

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Fields at Chestnut
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Longmeadow
Moderate
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#102 of 104 tracts In Hampden County
Very Low
Within state
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#1,581 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Longmeadow and the region

Centroid at 42.0536, -72.5484 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fields at Chestnut scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Longmeadow
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$423 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Longmeadow
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Longmeadow
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Longmeadow
4.6

How Fields at Chestnut compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fields at Chestnut risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 8133034.3Longmeadowparent city5.8Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fields at Chestnut. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fields at Chestnut

Against the Hampden County average of 5.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.8 points. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10. 24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.2/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10. Food insecurity runs 5.6% against 17.8% nationally.

Adults with no health insurance runs 2.4% against 11.3% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 3% of average household income of $185,565, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 3.2 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 25013813303

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25013813303?

Census tract 25013813303 in the Fields at Chestnut neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25013813303?

Median gross rent is $423/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25013813303?

4.9% of residents in tract 25013813303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,618.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25013813303?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 71th, minority 27th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 25013813303 considered part of Fields at Chestnut?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25013813303 fall within Fields at Chestnut (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 25013813303 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 25013813303 compare to Longmeadow overall?

Tract 25013813303 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Longmeadow at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Longmeadow; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Longmeadow

Top eight tracts in Longmeadow ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related