Skip to content
Neighborhood · Longmeadow, MA

Fields at Chestnut Eviction Risk: Lower

3 census tracts · pop 12,025 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.6/10 · range 3–5.6

Fields at Chestnut is a 3-tract neighborhood of Longmeadow, MA and houses 12,025 people. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.6/10, in the Lower tier. The main counterweight is economic stress, at 1.1/10.

Internally this is not one market. Tract scores span 3 to 5.6, so two buildings inside the same boundary can carry materially different risk. Average gross rent is $1,247, 26% below the Longmeadow average of $1,682.

30% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, below the Longmeadow rate of 36.1%. The severe-burden share is 13%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.

4.0% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. Food insecurity affects 9.6% of adults, 8.2 points below the national rate.

Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Rent takes 12% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Underwrite the address, not the area: with 2.6 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
3 tracts · population-weighted
Fields at Chestnut vs Longmeadow How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
29.5% -18%
Longmeadow: 36.1%
Average gross rent
$1,247 -26%
Longmeadow: $1,682
Average HH income
$126,437 -13%
Longmeadow: $144,639
Poverty rate
3.0% -24%
Longmeadow: 3.9%
Renter share
12.2% +23%
Longmeadow: 9.9%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Fields at Chestnut and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 3 tracts span score 3–5.6

Why Fields at Chestnut scores 3.6

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 6.2–6.2 across tracts
6.2
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.9–5.9 across tracts
5.9
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.2–7.0 across tracts
6.4
Rent control risk
30% of income on rent · Range 5.5–6.5 across tracts
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 5.0–7.0 across tracts
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
12% renter households · Range 2.6–6.5 across tracts
3.9
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 4.6–7.0 across tracts
5.2
Economic stress
3.0% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.2 across tracts
1.1
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.0–7.0 across tracts
4.6
Risk score comparison

Fields at Chestnut vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Fields at Chestnut score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.6Fields at ChestnutNeighborhood4.3Parent cityhost city6.4Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Fields at Chestnut?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 2.6 points from 3 to 5.6. This neighborhood crosses multiple risk tiers, so block-by-block conditions vary substantially.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

3 tracts in Fields at Chestnut

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
25013802602 5.6 1,867 31% $1,667
25013813401 3.5 5,540 15% $1,793
25013813303 3 4,618 46% $423
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 28

Pop-weighted across 3 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 14%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 72%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 30%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 36%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Fields at Chestnut

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Fields at Chestnut

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Fields at Chestnut?

Fields at Chestnut scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier) across 3 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Fields at Chestnut compare to Longmeadow overall?

Fields at Chestnut scores 0.7 points lower than Longmeadow overall (4.3/10). Renters spend 30% of income on rent vs 36% citywide. Average rent: $1,247 vs $1,682.
Q3

What is the average rent in Fields at Chestnut?

Average gross rent in Fields at Chestnut is $1,247/month (pop-weighted across 3 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Fields at Chestnut residents are renters?

12% of Fields at Chestnut households are renter-occupied (vs 10% in Longmeadow). The neighborhood has 12,025 residents.
Q5

Is Fields at Chestnut a high social-vulnerability area?

Fields at Chestnut sits in the 28th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Fields at Chestnut have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Fields at Chestnut is census tract 25013802602 (score 5.6/10). Across the 3 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 3 to 5.6, a spread of 2.6 points.
Q7

How safe is Fields at Chestnut for landlords?

Fields at Chestnut carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.6/10). Pop-weighted across 3 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Longmeadow as a whole (4.3/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Fields at Chestnut?

Fields at Chestnut has 12,119 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (79.5%), Hispanic / Latino (6.1%), Other / Multiracial (5.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Fields at Chestnut

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Longmeadow

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Fields at Chestnut.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further