Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Reading Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 25017334300 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 7,752

Tract 25017334300 sits in Reading, MA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. Population here is 7,752. It sits 2.9 points below the Middlesex County average of 6.3.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 6% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units2,743
Renter share9.0%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$163,993

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Reading
Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#351 of 357 tracts In Middlesex County
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#1,542 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Very Low
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#59,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Reading and the region

Centroid at 42.5482, -71.1108 · click any tract to drill in

Why Reading scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Reading
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$855 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Reading
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Reading
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Reading
3.1

How Reading compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Reading risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 3343004.4Readingparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 15Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1.45%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.9%Peak (2015)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 25017334300
Filings climbed 300% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 0Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Reading

Average gross rent is $855, 57% below the Reading average. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.

Cost burden runs 30% here against 43.0% across Middlesex County. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8.3/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

SNAP participation runs 6.6% against 15.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 15 evictions over 5 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 6.1% against 14.2% nationally.

The worst year on record was 2015, when 1.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 29th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 6% of average household income of $163,993, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 2.8 points cooler.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 25017334300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017334300?

Census tract 25017334300 in Reading scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 25017334300?

Median gross rent is $855/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 25017334300?

3.3% of residents in tract 25017334300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,752.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 25017334300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 17th, minority 17th, housing 28th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017334300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 15 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017334300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.45% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 25017334300 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 25017334300 compare to Reading overall?

Tract 25017334300 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Reading at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Reading; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Reading

Top eight tracts in Reading ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related