Inner Belt Eviction Risk: High , Cambridge
Tract 25017352101 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 3,245 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
25017352101 is a census tract in the Inner Belt area of Cambridge, MA. It scores 9.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,245. It sits 3.1 points above the Middlesex County average of 6.3.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Cambridge and the region
Centroid at 42.3716, -71.0740 · click any tract to drill in
Why Inner Belt scores 9.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Inner Belt compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 69%Racial/ethnic minority
- 95%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 306Total filings over 5 yrs
- 8.07%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2016)
- 83Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 6.2Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Inner Belt. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.3%Food insecurity
- 7.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.6%Transit barriers
- 3.5%No health insurance
- 15.4%Frequent mental distress
- 17.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Inner Belt
What pushes it up most is local political climate at 9/10. Severe burden reaches 26%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
This is renter territory: 83% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Set annual rent against average income of $114,408 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. Average gross rent is $3,224, 16% above the Cambridge average. The filing record is not thin: 306 evictions over 5 years of observation.
Adults with no health insurance runs 3.5% against 11.3% nationally. The voucher gap is 13.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Filings peaked in 2016 at 7.4% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 8.1% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 25017352101
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017352101?
What is the average rent in tract 25017352101?
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017352101?
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017352101?
Is tract 25017352101 considered part of Inner Belt?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017352101?
Did eviction filings in tract 25017352101 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 25017352101 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 25017352101 compare to Cambridge overall?
Was tract 25017352101 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Cambridge
Top eight tracts in Cambridge ranked by composite eviction-risk score.