Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,413 of 84,120 nationally
Inner Belt Eviction Risk: High , Cambridge
Tract 25017352102 · Middlesex County, MA · pop 2,886 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
25017352102 is a census tract in the Inner Belt area of Cambridge, MA. It scores 8.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,886. Against Middlesex County at 43.0%, 30% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 37%
Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,371
Renter share52.9%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$171,745
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
34
th percentile
Low
Within county
90
th percentile
Very High
Within state
92
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cambridge and the region
Centroid at 42.3685, -71.0758 · click any tract to drill in
Why Inner Belt scores 8.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cambridge
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,935 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cambridge
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cambridge
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cambridge
8.0
How Inner Belt compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 35%Socioeconomic
- 3%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 92%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 29%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 24Total filings over 5 yrs
- 0.93%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.6%Peak (2014)
- 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 0Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Inner Belt. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.3%Housing insecurity
- 4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 7.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.6%Transit barriers
- 3.8%No health insurance
- 13.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Inner Belt
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. It sits 2.2 points above the Middlesex County average of 6.3.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. Food insecurity runs 7.8% against 17.8% nationally.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 24 filings here across 5 tracked years. The severe-burden share is 8%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. SNAP participation runs 7.7% against 15.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 1.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 0.9% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 94th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 25017352102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017352102?
Census tract 25017352102 in the Inner Belt neighborhood scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25017352102?
Median gross rent is $2,935/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017352102?
8.2% of residents in tract 25017352102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,886.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017352102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 3th, minority 55th, housing 92th.
Q5
Is tract 25017352102 considered part of Inner Belt?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017352102 fall within Inner Belt (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017352102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 24 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017352102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.93% of renter households, peaking at 1.6% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 25017352102 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.00× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 25017352102 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 25017352102 compare to Cambridge overall?
Tract 25017352102 scores 8.5/10, lower than the parent city of Cambridge at 8.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cambridge eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 25017352102 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 29% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cambridge
Top eight tracts in Cambridge ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · MA
West Somerville
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Harvard Yard
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Brickbottom
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Harvard Yard
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Old Cambridge
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Harlow Square
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Inman Square
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · MA
Huron Village
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related