Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally
Inner Belt Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cambridge
Tract 25017352102 ·
Middlesex County, MA · pop 2,886 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
The Moderate-tier score of 5.7/10 for census tract 25017352102 reflects conditions in the Inner Belt area of Cambridge, Massachusetts. It lands near the 65th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 30% of renter households, a moderate level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,935 monthly, set against $171,745 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 53% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%Stable renters 37%Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,371
Renter share52.9%
SVI overall0.40
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$171,745
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Inner Belt
Very Low
Within parent city
31th percentile
#23 of 33 tracts In Cambridge
Low
Within county
78th percentile
#79 of 357 tracts In Middlesex County
High
Within state
63th percentile
#602 of 1,613 tracts In Massachusetts
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cambridge and the region
Centroid at 42.3685, -71.0758 · click any tract to drill in
Why Inner Belt scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cambridge
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$2,935 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cambridge
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cambridge
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cambridge
8.0
How Inner Belt compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 40
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
35%Socioeconomic
3%Household composition
55%Racial/ethnic minority
92%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
29%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
24Total filings over 5 yrs
0.93%Avg annual filing rate
1.6%Peak (2014)
6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2012 to 2016
Filings climbed 50% over the past 5 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
0Total filings 2020-21
0.0Avg monthly (observed)
0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2023-11-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Boston, MA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Inner Belt. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.3%Housing insecurity
4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
7.8%Food insecurity
7.7%SNAP enrollment
5.6%Transit barriers
3.8%No health insurance
13.5%Frequent mental distress
21.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Inner Belt
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cambridge eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Middlesex County average of 5.2 and in line with the Massachusetts statewide average of 5.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 40th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 25017352102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25017352102?
Census tract 25017352102 in the Inner Belt neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25017352102?
Median gross rent is $2,935/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25017352102?
8.2% of residents in tract 25017352102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,886.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25017352102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 40th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 3th, minority 55th, housing 92th.
Q5
Is tract 25017352102 considered part of Inner Belt?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25017352102 fall within Inner Belt (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25017352102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 24 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 25017352102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.93% of renter households, peaking at 1.6% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 25017352102 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.00× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Boston eviction risk, MA), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 25017352102 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 25017352102 compare to Cambridge overall?
Tract 25017352102 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Cambridge at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cambridge eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10
Was tract 25017352102 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 29% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cambridge
Top eight tracts in Cambridge ranked by composite eviction-risk score.