Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Groesbeck Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lansing

Tract 26065003103 · Ingham County, MI · pop 5,649 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

In the Groesbeck area of Lansing, census tract 26065003103 scores 6.2/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 80% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,103 a month while the average household earns $60,714 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 48% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 26% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units2,718
Renter share47.8%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate22.1%
Median income$60,714

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Groesbeck
Moderate
Within parent city
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 41 tracts In Lansing
Elevated
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#595 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7536, -84.5201 · click any tract to drill in

Why Groesbeck scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lansing
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
22.1% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,103 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansing
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansing
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansing
4.5

How Groesbeck compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Groesbeck risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 003103Lansing: 3.73.7Lansingparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Groesbeck

What moves this score most is economic stress at 5.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansing eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ingham County average of 6.2 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 2% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065003103

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065003103?

Census tract 26065003103 in the Groesbeck neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26065003103?

Median gross rent is $1,103/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065003103?

22.1% of residents in tract 26065003103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,649.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065003103?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 26th, minority 56th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 26065003103 considered part of Groesbeck?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065003103 fall within Groesbeck (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26065003103 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26065003103 compare to Lansing overall?

Tract 26065003103 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Lansing at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26065003103 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansing

Top eight tracts in Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related