Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,043 of 84,120 nationally

Red Cedar Eviction Risk: Elevated , East Lansing

Tract 26065004403 · Ingham County, MI · pop 2,255 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 26065004403 covers part of the Red Cedar area of East Lansing, MI, and scores 7.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,255. Severe burden reaches 43%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
7.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 35% Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units845
Renter share73.0%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate48.6%
Median income$41,146

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Red Cedar
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 19 tracts In East Lansing
Elevated
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 84 tracts In Ingham County
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across East Lansing and the region

Centroid at 42.7244, -84.4975 · click any tract to drill in

Why Red Cedar scores 7.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from East Lansing
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
48.6% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$956 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from East Lansing
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from East Lansing
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from East Lansing
9.5

How Red Cedar compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Red Cedar risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.8This tracttract 0044036.4East Lansingparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Red Cedar. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Red Cedar

It sits 3.2 points above the Ingham County average of 4.6. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10.

The poverty rate is 49%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.6/10.

73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. about half of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Ingham County average of 46.5%. Average gross rent is $956, 18% below the East Lansing average.

SNAP participation runs 23.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 24.9% against 17.8% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #9,043 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 26065004403

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065004403?

Census tract 26065004403 in the Red Cedar neighborhood scores 7.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26065004403?

Median gross rent is $956/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26065004403?

48.6% of residents in tract 26065004403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,255.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26065004403?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 1th, minority 56th, housing 77th.
Q5

Is tract 26065004403 considered part of Red Cedar?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26065004403 fall within Red Cedar (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26065004403 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26065004403 compare to East Lansing overall?

Tract 26065004403 scores 7.8/10, higher than the parent city of East Lansing at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from East Lansing eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26065004403 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in East Lansing

Top eight tracts in East Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related