Red Cedar Eviction Risk: Elevated , East Lansing
Tract 26065004403 · Ingham County, MI · pop 2,255 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 26065004403 covers part of the Red Cedar area of East Lansing, MI, and scores 7.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,255. Severe burden reaches 43%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across East Lansing and the region
Centroid at 42.7244, -84.4975 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Cedar scores 7.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Red Cedar compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 56%Racial/ethnic minority
- 77%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 37%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Red Cedar. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.6%Housing insecurity
- 11.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.9%Food insecurity
- 23.8%SNAP enrollment
- 15.4%Transit barriers
- 7.8%No health insurance
- 25.2%Frequent mental distress
- 33.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Red Cedar
It sits 3.2 points above the Ingham County average of 4.6. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10.
The poverty rate is 49%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.6/10.
73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. about half of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Ingham County average of 46.5%. Average gross rent is $956, 18% below the East Lansing average.
SNAP participation runs 23.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 24.9% against 17.8% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #9,043 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 26065004403
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26065004403?
What is the average rent in tract 26065004403?
What is the poverty rate in tract 26065004403?
How socially vulnerable is tract 26065004403?
Is tract 26065004403 considered part of Red Cedar?
What share of households in tract 26065004403 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 26065004403 compare to East Lansing overall?
Was tract 26065004403 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in East Lansing
Top eight tracts in East Lansing ranked by composite eviction-risk score.