Neighborhood · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally
Godwin Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Wyoming
Tract 26081014100 ·
Kent County, MI · pop 2,307 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
26081014100 is a census tract in the Godwin Heights area of Wyoming, MI. It scores 4.4/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,307. roughly one in eight of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Kent County average of 43.7%.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 14%Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units703
Renter share16.4%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate11.6%
Median income$80,685
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33th percentile
#5 of 7 tracts In Godwin Heights
Low
Within parent city
41th percentile
#11 of 18 tracts In Wyoming
Moderate
Within county
60th percentile
#59 of 145 tracts In Kent County
Elevated
Within state
63th percentile
#1,103 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Wyoming and the region
Centroid at 42.8911, -85.6721 · click any tract to drill in
Why Godwin Heights scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Wyoming
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
11.6% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Wyoming
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Wyoming
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Wyoming
6.1
How Godwin Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
51%Socioeconomic
87%Household composition
71%Racial/ethnic minority
25%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
94%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Godwin Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
15.7%Housing insecurity
10.2%Utility-shutoff threat
19.7%Food insecurity
16.5%SNAP enrollment
10.1%Transit barriers
11.4%No health insurance
18.9%Frequent mental distress
31.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Godwin Heights
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.2/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.7/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.9/10.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Grand Rapids. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 49th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.1/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 26081014100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26081014100?
Census tract 26081014100 in the Godwin Heights neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 26081014100?
11.6% of residents in tract 26081014100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,307.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 26081014100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 87th, minority 71th, housing 25th.
Q4
Is tract 26081014100 considered part of Godwin Heights?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26081014100 fall within Godwin Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 26081014100 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 26081014100 compare to Wyoming overall?
Tract 26081014100 scores 4.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Wyoming at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Wyoming eviction laws; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 26081014100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Wyoming
Top eight tracts in Wyoming ranked by composite eviction-risk score.