Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally
Pierce Eviction Risk: Lower , Beverly Hills
Tract 26125153300 · Oakland County, MI · pop 3,774 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
The Pierce neighborhood of Beverly Hills anchors census tract 26125153300, which lands at 4.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 29% of US census tracts.
About 7% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,661 a month against an average household income of $192,788 a year, roughly 10% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,560
Renter share15.7%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$192,788
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
1
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
1
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Beverly Hills and the region
Centroid at 42.5351, -83.2135 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pierce scores 1.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Beverly Hills
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,661 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beverly Hills
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beverly Hills
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beverly Hills
3.7
How Pierce compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 3%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 16%Racial/ethnic minority
- 7%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 89%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Pierce. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.4%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.4%Food insecurity
- 3.9%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 3.0%No health insurance
- 13.1%Frequent mental distress
- 15.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pierce
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 7.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Beverly Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Oakland County average of 5.7 and below the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 26125153300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125153300?
Census tract 26125153300 in the Pierce neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 26125153300?
Median gross rent is $1,661/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 7% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 26125153300?
3.0% of residents in tract 26125153300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,774.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 26125153300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 22th, minority 16th, housing 7th.
Q5
Is tract 26125153300 considered part of Pierce?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125153300 fall within Pierce (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 26125153300 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 26125153300 compare to Beverly Hills overall?
Tract 26125153300 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Beverly Hills at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beverly Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 26125153300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Beverly Hills
Top eight tracts in Beverly Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related