Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Dunmore Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount

Tract 27037061008 · Dakota County, MN · pop 2,129 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 5.2/10, tract 27037061008 in Dunmore in Rosemount ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,129 residents. That is riskier than roughly 46% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 48% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,412 a month while the average household earns $78,125 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 39% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 20% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units999
Renter share39.0%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$78,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Dunmore
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In Rosemount
Very High
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 106 tracts In Dakota County
Elevated
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#1,090 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosemount and the region

Centroid at 44.7404, -93.1272 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dunmore scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,412 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3

How Dunmore compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dunmore risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 061008Rosemount: 4.94.9Rosemountparent cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 97Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 7.61%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.8%Peak (2009)
  • 18Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270370610082009: 28 filings (13.77/100 renter HHs)2010: 17 filings (6.16/100 renter HHs)2011: 25 filings (8.71/100 renter HHs)2012: 9 filings (3.14/100 renter HHs)2013: 18 filings (6.27/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 36% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dunmore

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Dakota County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 97 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 7.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.8% of renter households in 2009.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27037061008

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061008?

Census tract 27037061008 in the Dunmore neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27037061008?

Median gross rent is $1,412/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061008?

4.6% of residents in tract 27037061008 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,129.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061008?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 44th, minority 18th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 27037061008 considered part of Dunmore?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061008 fall within Dunmore (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061008?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 97 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061008 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.61% of renter households, peaking at 13.8% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27037061008 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27037061008 compare to Rosemount overall?

Tract 27037061008 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Rosemount at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount

Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related