Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Dunmore 2nd Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount
Tract 27037061009 · Dakota County, MN · pop 7,166 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 27037061009 covers part of the Dunmore 2nd area of Rosemount, MN, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 7,166. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,490
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate1.7%
Median income$165,882
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
18
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rosemount and the region
Centroid at 44.7464, -93.1059 · click any tract to drill in
Why Dunmore 2nd scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
1.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,864 rent vs county FMR
6.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3
How Dunmore 2nd compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 26%Household composition
- 27%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 37Total filings over 5 yrs
- 6.73%Avg annual filing rate
- 17.0%Peak (2009)
- 2Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 86% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.1%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.4%Transit barriers
- 5.8%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 21.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Dunmore 2nd
33% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Dakota County average of 45.6%. Against the Dakota County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points.
SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 8.1% against 17.8% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The filing record is not thin: 37 evictions over 5 years of observation.
At $1,864 a month, rents run 14% over what the rest of Rosemount commands. The worst year on record was 2009, when 17.0% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 6.7% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $165,882, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 27037061009
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061009?
Census tract 27037061009 in the Dunmore 2nd neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27037061009?
Median gross rent is $1,864/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061009?
1.7% of residents in tract 27037061009 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,166.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061009?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 26th, minority 27th, housing 9th.
Q5
Is tract 27037061009 considered part of Dunmore 2nd?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061009 fall within Dunmore 2nd (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061009?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 37 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061009 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.73% of renter households, peaking at 17.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27037061009 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27037061009 compare to Rosemount overall?
Tract 27037061009 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Rosemount at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount
Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related