Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Armatage Eviction Risk: Lower , Edina

Tract 27053012001 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 6,247 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 27053012001 covers the Armatage neighborhood of Edina, home to 6,247 residents. For landlords it grades 5.6/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 23% of renter households, a moderate level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,185 a month while the average household earns $146,117 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 14% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,560
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate1.4%
Median income$146,117

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Armatage
Very High
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#121 of 121 tracts In Edina
Very Low
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#159 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Moderate
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#646 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Edina and the region

Centroid at 44.8970, -93.3054 · click any tract to drill in

Why Armatage scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Edina
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
1.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,185 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Edina
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Edina
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Edina
7.0

How Armatage compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Armatage risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 012001Edina: 4.94.9Edinaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 58Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.0%Peak (2010)
  • 7Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270530120012009: 12 filings (3.60/100 renter HHs)2010: 14 filings (4.01/100 renter HHs)2011: 13 filings (3.81/100 renter HHs)2012: 12 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (2.05/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 42% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 21Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (1.14× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Armatage. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Armatage

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Edina eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 58 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 3.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.0% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053012001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053012001?

Census tract 27053012001 in the Armatage neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053012001?

Median gross rent is $2,185/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053012001?

1.4% of residents in tract 27053012001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,247.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053012001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 18th, minority 31th, housing 26th.
Q5

Is tract 27053012001 considered part of Armatage?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053012001 fall within Armatage (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053012001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 58 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053012001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.40% of renter households, peaking at 4.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053012001 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053012001 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053012001 compare to Edina overall?

Tract 27053012001 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Edina at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Edina eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27053012001 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Edina

Top eight tracts in Edina ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related