Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally

North Loop Eviction Risk: Elevated , Minneapolis

Tract 27053126201 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,250 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 27053126201 covers part of the North Loop area of Minneapolis, MN, and scores 7.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,250 residents. Average gross rent is $2,053, 50% above the Minneapolis average.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 56% Owners 14%
Tract context
Occupied units1,644
Renter share86.1%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate19.0%
Median income$113,462

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In North Loop
Very High
Within parent city
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#65 of 121 tracts In Minneapolis
Moderate
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#111 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Minneapolis and the region

Centroid at 44.9840, -93.2827 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Loop scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Minneapolis
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
19.0% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$2,053 rent vs county FMR
7.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Minneapolis
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Minneapolis
7.0

How North Loop compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Loop risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.17.1This tracttract 126201Minneapolis: 6.66.6Minneapolisparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 279Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.86×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.72× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (2.17× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (8.04× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (3.11× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (6.25× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 13 filings (8.67× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (2.90× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.78× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.79× baseline)2023-10-01: 7 filings (18.42× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-04-01: 9 filings (5.14× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (5.36× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (4.46× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (13.16× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (4.46× baseline)2024-12-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (5.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (4.35× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 13 filings (11.61× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-09-01: 9 filings (8.04× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (23.68× baseline)2025-11-01: 16 filings (14.29× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within North Loop. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Loop

The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. 86% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Against the Hennepin County average of 5.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.0 points.

On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10. roughly one in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Hennepin County average of 43.1%. The voucher gap is 21.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.5/10. The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

SNAP participation runs 7.4% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 10.8% against 17.8% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053126201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053126201?

Census tract 27053126201 in the North Loop neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053126201?

Median gross rent is $2,053/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053126201?

19.0% of residents in tract 27053126201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,250.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053126201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 4th, minority 52th, housing 86th.
Q5

Is tract 27053126201 considered part of North Loop?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053126201 fall within North Loop (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 27053126201 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.86× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27053126201 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27053126201 compare to Minneapolis overall?

Tract 27053126201 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Minneapolis at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Minneapolis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 27053126201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 37% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Minneapolis

Top eight tracts in Minneapolis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related