Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Rondo Eviction Risk: Moderate , St. Paul

Tract 27123032400 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 3,294 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 27123032400 covers Rondo in St. Paul, home to 3,294 residents. For landlords it grades 6.5/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $909 a month against an average household income of $59,188 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 37% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 21% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,171
Renter share37.1%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate21.1%
Median income$59,188

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 16 tracts In Rondo
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 85 tracts In St. Paul
High
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 143 tracts In Ramsey County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#113 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Paul and the region

Centroid at 44.9633, -93.1369 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rondo scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Paul
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
21.1% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$909 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Paul
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Paul
7.5

How Rondo compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rondo risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 032400St. Paul: 6.66.6St. Paulparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 327Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 8.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.1%Peak (2012)
  • 36Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271230324002009: 47 filings (8.16/100 renter HHs)2010: 32 filings (5.85/100 renter HHs)2011: 54 filings (10.33/100 renter HHs)2012: 58 filings (11.09/100 renter HHs)2013: 56 filings (10.71/100 renter HHs)2014: 44 filings (8.41/100 renter HHs)2015: 36 filings (6.88/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 23% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 169Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.77×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.38× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.48× baseline)2023-03-01: 13 filings (6.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 13 filings (3.85× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.96× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (1.10× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (2.07× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.76× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (2.46× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.18× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.32× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rondo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rondo

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Ramsey County average of 6.0 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 327 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 8.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.1% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 27123032400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123032400?

Census tract 27123032400 in the Rondo neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27123032400?

Median gross rent is $909/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27123032400?

21.1% of residents in tract 27123032400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,294.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27123032400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 66th, minority 79th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 27123032400 considered part of Rondo?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27123032400 fall within Rondo (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123032400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 327 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 27123032400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.78% of renter households, peaking at 11.1% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27123032400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.77× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27123032400 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27123032400 compare to St. Paul overall?

Tract 27123032400 scores 5.9/10, lower than the parent city of St. Paul at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Paul eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 27123032400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Paul

Top eight tracts in St. Paul ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related