Rondo Eviction Risk: Elevated , St. Paul
Tract 27123035800 · Ramsey County, MN · pop 2,889 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Census tract 27123035800 covers part of the Rondo area of St. Paul, MN, and scores 6.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. about a quarter of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Ramsey County average of 47.3%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across St. Paul and the region
Centroid at 44.9415, -93.1193 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rondo scores 6.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rondo compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 27%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 16%Grade A
- 44%Grade B
- 32%Grade C
- 7%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 102Total filings over 7 yrs
- 1.52%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.9%Peak (2014)
- 14Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 53Total filings 2020-21
- 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.80×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rondo. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.8%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.7%Transit barriers
- 4.9%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 21.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rondo
The dominant input is local political climate at 9/10. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10. Food insecurity runs 7.8% against 17.8% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 102 evictions over 7 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 6.8% against 14.2% nationally.
Against the Ramsey County average of 5.6, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.6 points. Filings peaked in 2014 at 1.9% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 1.5% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 80th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 27123035800
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27123035800?
What is the average rent in tract 27123035800?
What is the poverty rate in tract 27123035800?
How socially vulnerable is tract 27123035800?
Is tract 27123035800 considered part of Rondo?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27123035800?
Did eviction filings in tract 27123035800 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 27123035800 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 27123035800 compare to St. Paul overall?
Was tract 27123035800 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in St. Paul
Top eight tracts in St. Paul ranked by composite eviction-risk score.