Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally

Faribault Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27131070400 · Rice County, MN · pop 4,374 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Faribault

Census tract 27131070400 sits in Faribault eviction risk, Minnesota eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. It lands near the 26th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,271 a month while the average household earns $102,566 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 4% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,603
Renter share5.7%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$102,566

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Faribault
Very Low
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 16 tracts In Rice County
Elevated
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#606 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
National
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#42,763 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Faribault and the region

Centroid at 44.2763, -93.2026 · click any tract to drill in

Why Faribault scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Faribault
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,271 rent vs county FMR
5.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Faribault
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Faribault
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Faribault
7.3

How Faribault compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Faribault risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 070400Faribault: 5.15.1Faribaultparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 7Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 1.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.1%Peak (2013)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271310704002013: 4 filings (3.10/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 2 filings (1.55/100 renter HHs)2017: 1 filings (0.69/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 75% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Faribault

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Faribault eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Rice County average of 4.5 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 8th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27131070400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27131070400?

Census tract 27131070400 in Faribault scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27131070400?

Median gross rent is $1,271/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27131070400?

5.1% of residents in tract 27131070400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,374.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27131070400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 12th, minority 4th, housing 31th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27131070400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 7 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 27131070400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.78% of renter households, peaking at 3.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27131070400 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27131070400 compare to Faribault overall?

Tract 27131070400 scores 3.9/10, lower than the parent city of Faribault at 5.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Faribault eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Faribault

Top eight tracts in Faribault ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related