Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

North Hyde Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kansas City

Tract 29095017800 · Jackson County, MO · pop 3,939 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 29095017800 covers part of the North Hyde Park area of Kansas City, MO, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,939. This is renter territory: 84% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 48% Owners 16%
Tract context
Occupied units2,083
Renter share84.0%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate21.9%
Median income$51,709

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In North Hyde Park
Moderate
Within parent city
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
Elevated
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#51 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.0662, -94.5786 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Hyde Park scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
21.9% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,083 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How North Hyde Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Hyde Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 017800Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,395Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 13.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 26.3%Peak (2006)
  • 159Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 290950178002003: 211 filings (12.87/100 renter HHs)2004: 201 filings (12.26/100 renter HHs)2005: 263 filings (22.79/100 renter HHs)2006: 303 filings (26.26/100 renter HHs)2007: 198 filings (17.16/100 renter HHs)2008: 152 filings (13.17/100 renter HHs)2009: 148 filings (12.82/100 renter HHs)2010: 150 filings (10.58/100 renter HHs)2011: 127 filings (10.39/100 renter HHs)2012: 123 filings (10.07/100 renter HHs)2013: 123 filings (10.07/100 renter HHs)2014: 112 filings (9.17/100 renter HHs)2015: 125 filings (10.23/100 renter HHs)2017: 159 filings (10.94/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 14 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,110Total filings 2020-21
  • 14.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 9.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.49×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 13 filings (1.06× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (1.06× baseline)2020-03-01: 7 filings (0.74× baseline)2020-04-01: 9 filings (1.38× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-06-01: 9 filings (0.72× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-09-01: 11 filings (1.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (0.68× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.39× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (0.59× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-05-01: 7 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-06-01: 7 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-08-01: 7 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-09-01: 12 filings (1.55× baseline)2021-10-01: 12 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-12-01: 15 filings (1.94× baseline)2022-01-01: 16 filings (1.31× baseline)2022-02-01: 20 filings (2.35× baseline)2022-03-01: 50 filings (5.26× baseline)2022-04-01: 23 filings (3.54× baseline)2022-05-01: 20 filings (1.63× baseline)2022-06-01: 23 filings (1.84× baseline)2022-07-01: 8 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-08-01: 26 filings (2.42× baseline)2022-09-01: 30 filings (3.87× baseline)2022-10-01: 7 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-11-01: 26 filings (2.17× baseline)2022-12-01: 14 filings (1.81× baseline)2023-01-01: 16 filings (1.31× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (0.82× baseline)2023-03-01: 12 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-04-01: 17 filings (2.62× baseline)2023-05-01: 12 filings (0.98× baseline)2023-06-01: 21 filings (1.68× baseline)2023-07-01: 13 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-08-01: 16 filings (1.49× baseline)2023-09-01: 25 filings (3.23× baseline)2023-10-01: 16 filings (1.21× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (0.58× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (1.42× baseline)2024-01-01: 12 filings (0.98× baseline)2024-02-01: 19 filings (2.24× baseline)2024-03-01: 13 filings (1.37× baseline)2024-04-01: 17 filings (2.62× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-06-01: 16 filings (1.28× baseline)2024-07-01: 34 filings (3.02× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-09-01: 21 filings (2.71× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-11-01: 18 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 25 filings (3.23× baseline)2025-01-01: 18 filings (1.47× baseline)2025-02-01: 22 filings (2.59× baseline)2025-03-01: 36 filings (3.79× baseline)2025-04-01: 13 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 17 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-06-01: 9 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-07-01: 27 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-08-01: 12 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-09-01: 24 filings (3.10× baseline)2025-10-01: 20 filings (1.51× baseline)2025-11-01: 16 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-12-01: 8 filings (1.03× baseline)2026-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Hyde Park

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.5/10. The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.4/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.1/10.

The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. It sits 1.2 points above the Jackson County average of 4.2.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,395 filings here across 14 tracked years. At $1,083 a month, rents run 13% under what the rest of Kansas City commands.

Filings peaked in 2006 at 26.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 13.5% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095017800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095017800?

Census tract 29095017800 in the North Hyde Park neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095017800?

Median gross rent is $1,083/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095017800?

21.9% of residents in tract 29095017800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,939.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095017800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 3th, minority 62th, housing 95th.
Q5

Is tract 29095017800 considered part of North Hyde Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29095017800 fall within North Hyde Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29095017800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,395 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 29095017800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.48% of renter households, peaking at 26.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29095017800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.49× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29095017800 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29095017800 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095017800 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29095017800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 71% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related