Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Riverview Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glasgow Village
Tract 29189210300 ·
St. Louis County, MO · pop 3,267 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
29189210300 is a census tract in the Riverview area of Riverview, MO. It scores 5/10 for landlords. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%Stable renters 37%Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,482
Renter share55.0%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$55,229
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Riverview
Very Low
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Glasgow Village
Moderate
Within county
79th percentile
#50 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
High
Within state
86th percentile
#237 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glasgow Village and the region
Centroid at 38.7446, -90.2118 · click any tract to drill in
Why Riverview scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glasgow Village
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$969 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glasgow Village
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glasgow Village
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glasgow Village
6.6
How Riverview compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
88%Socioeconomic
63%Household composition
84%Racial/ethnic minority
54%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
618Total filings over 8 yrs
13.02%Avg annual filing rate
15.0%Peak (2012)
90Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year2003 to 2017
Filings climbed 55% over the past 8 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
576Total filings 2020-21
7.5Avg monthly (observed)
7.3Pre-pandemic baseline
1.03×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
27.2%Housing insecurity
21.1%Utility-shutoff threat
29.2%Food insecurity
26.8%SNAP enrollment
16.7%Transit barriers
10.9%No health insurance
21.4%Frequent mental distress
41.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Riverview
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10. Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
33% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the St. Louis County average of 42.0%. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 27.2% against 14.2% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 26.8% against 15.2% nationally. At $969 a month, rents run 21% over what the rest of Riverview commands.
Against the St. Louis County average of 4.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. Court records carry 618 eviction filings across 8 observed years. The worst year on record was 2012, when 15.0% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 13.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 8.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 29189210300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189210300?
Census tract 29189210300 in the Riverview neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 29189210300?
Median gross rent is $969/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 29189210300?
9.4% of residents in tract 29189210300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,267.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 29189210300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 63th, minority 84th, housing 54th.
Q5
Is tract 29189210300 considered part of Riverview?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29189210300 fall within Riverview (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189210300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 618 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189210300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.02% of renter households, peaking at 15.0% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 29189210300 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.03× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 29189210300 struggle to pay rent?
About 27.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 29189210300 compare to Glasgow Village overall?
Tract 29189210300 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Glasgow Village at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glasgow Village; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.