Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Riverview Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glasgow Village

Tract 29189210200 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 6,901 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.9/10 for census tract 29189210200 reflects conditions in the Riverview area of Glasgow Village, Missouri. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,068 a month against an average household income of $38,600 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 60% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 19% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,527
Renter share59.8%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate34.3%
Median income$38,600

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Riverview
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Glasgow Village
Moderate
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Very High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#71 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glasgow Village and the region

Centroid at 38.7592, -90.2025 · click any tract to drill in

Why Riverview scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glasgow Village
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
34.3% poverty · this tract
8.6
Supply constraint
$1,068 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glasgow Village
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glasgow Village
1.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glasgow Village
1.9

How Riverview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Riverview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 210200Glasgow Village: 2.82.8Glasgow Villageparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,002Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 14.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.0%Peak (2017)
  • 205Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892102002003: 82 filings (16.97/100 renter HHs)2004: 66 filings (13.66/100 renter HHs)2005: 87 filings (9.84/100 renter HHs)2006: 102 filings (11.53/100 renter HHs)2010: 130 filings (14.72/100 renter HHs)2012: 170 filings (14.15/100 renter HHs)2013: 160 filings (13.32/100 renter HHs)2017: 205 filings (18.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 150% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,343Total filings 2020-21
  • 17.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 12.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.39×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 28 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 24 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 11 filings (1.16× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.07× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-06-01: 11 filings (0.69× baseline)2020-07-01: 17 filings (0.81× baseline)2020-08-01: 12 filings (1.09× baseline)2020-09-01: 24 filings (1.85× baseline)2020-10-01: 12 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-11-01: 8 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-12-01: 18 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-01-01: 12 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2021-03-01: 12 filings (1.26× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-05-01: 16 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-06-01: 14 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-07-01: 16 filings (0.76× baseline)2021-08-01: 7 filings (0.64× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-10-01: 15 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-11-01: 13 filings (1.08× baseline)2021-12-01: 13 filings (1.24× baseline)2022-01-01: 14 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-03-01: 20 filings (2.11× baseline)2022-04-01: 12 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-05-01: 17 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 15 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-07-01: 11 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-08-01: 44 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 19 filings (1.46× baseline)2022-10-01: 11 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-11-01: 14 filings (1.17× baseline)2022-12-01: 14 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 33 filings (2.36× baseline)2023-02-01: 17 filings (2.83× baseline)2023-03-01: 29 filings (3.05× baseline)2023-04-01: 25 filings (1.85× baseline)2023-05-01: 23 filings (1.35× baseline)2023-06-01: 18 filings (1.13× baseline)2023-07-01: 17 filings (0.81× baseline)2023-08-01: 32 filings (2.91× baseline)2023-09-01: 23 filings (1.77× baseline)2023-10-01: 34 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 21 filings (1.75× baseline)2023-12-01: 22 filings (2.10× baseline)2024-01-01: 34 filings (2.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 17 filings (2.83× baseline)2024-03-01: 15 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-04-01: 18 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 20 filings (1.18× baseline)2024-06-01: 18 filings (1.13× baseline)2024-07-01: 26 filings (1.24× baseline)2024-08-01: 21 filings (1.91× baseline)2024-09-01: 21 filings (1.62× baseline)2024-10-01: 22 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-11-01: 18 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 23 filings (2.19× baseline)2025-01-01: 21 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 19 filings (3.17× baseline)2025-03-01: 17 filings (1.79× baseline)2025-04-01: 17 filings (1.26× baseline)2025-05-01: 16 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-06-01: 23 filings (1.44× baseline)2025-07-01: 22 filings (1.05× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-09-01: 15 filings (1.15× baseline)2025-10-01: 20 filings (1.18× baseline)2025-11-01: 15 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-12-01: 20 filings (1.90× baseline)2026-01-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Riverview. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Riverview

What moves this score most is economic stress at 8.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glasgow Village, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.39x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

In CDC survey modeling, about 39.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 33.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189210200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189210200?

Census tract 29189210200 in the Riverview neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189210200?

Median gross rent is $1,068/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189210200?

34.3% of residents in tract 29189210200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,901.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189210200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 76th, minority 89th, housing 55th.
Q5

Is tract 29189210200 considered part of Riverview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29189210200 fall within Riverview (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189210200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,002 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189210200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.02% of renter households, peaking at 18.0% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29189210200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.39× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29189210200 struggle to pay rent?

About 39.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 33.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29189210200 compare to Glasgow Village overall?

Tract 29189210200 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Glasgow Village at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glasgow Village; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related